Wi-Fi - Why I Don't Think It's As Safe As We Are Led To Believe

I spend several hours each day on my computer and have to admit I often feel categorically "weird".

When I've explained my symptoms to discrete family members they've dismissed me as neurotic and humoured me when I wear my bio guard pendants colse to my neck to protect me from electro magnetic fields.

Pendant

If I use my movable phone the left side of my face burns, my tongue and lips tingle, I feel a tightness in my chest as though I can't breathe properly and I get a strange pain in my left temple. I also feel sick and disorientated.

Wi-Fi - Why I Don't Think It's As Safe As We Are Led To Believe

#1 Sale Now 68596 Silver 6 Mm Genuine Peridot Pendant Enhancer

68596 Silver 6 Mm Genuine Peridot Pendant Enhancer Feature

• 0.66 DWT ( 1.03 grams)
• Silver
• In Stock
• GENUINE PERDIOT PENDANT ENHANC
• 7.50"

68596 Silver 6 Mm Genuine Peridot Pendant Enhancer Overview

Mounting Only: 85083

Available at Amazon Check Price Now!

Related Products

Customer Reviews

*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Jun 03, 2012 11:06:24

I get the same succeed if I use my computer for any distance of time particularly if I am in the room where we have the Wi-Fi box installed. For those of you who don't know Wi-Fi is an acronym for wireless fidelity and is a means by which people with laptop computers can move colse to and still be able to passage the internet.

We used to use a broadband cable but because there are sometimes three people wanting to be on a computer at the same time we found wireless so much easier.

However, last night on the television there was a programme about Wi-Fi. Which made me sit up and take notice because it featured some other people who experienced exactly the same problems.

It seems likely I suffer from electro sensitivity. Of course, I'd suspected that for a long time which is why I wear the bio guards but I had never made a association with the wireless set up before. I always notion it was the computer.

In Sweden the problem is recognised as an legal disability and affects about 3% of the population. If a similar frame exists in Uk then I have almost another 2 million fellow sufferers. It's strange therefore that the government currently insist there are none.

I don't believe them.

Of procedure my scepticism could come from the fact I've already been personally affected by two procedures which the government also insist are "safe". I've written books about both issues so you can tell I don't believe them whether - at least not now.

Both mercury dental amalgam and the Mmr are controversial issues and despite the fact they affect millions of people worldwide, the government insist any evidence is "anecdotal".

Who am I to argue?

Anyway, the government rely on international guidelines when they issue their statements and the World condition Organisation (Who) who are one of the prominent social condition bodies in the world have said that as far as Wi-Fi and the radiation emitted from movable phone masts are concerned, there are "no adverse condition effects from low level long term exposure".

I don't believe them either.

After all, how do they know? I'm categorically no scholar but Wi-Fi and movable phones are relatively new so I don't dream anyone has yet lived from the cradle to the grave being exposed to them which begs the query - How long is "long term exposure"?

Again in Sweden experiments have been carried out using lower levels of radiation than emitted from Wi-Fi and the succeed has been chromosome damage, a decrease in short-term memory, electro hypersensitivity and an increase in cancer.

I gathered from the programme that government guidelines are pretty much influenced by the business and are based on the "thermal" succeed as opposed to the "biological" succeed these radio waves have.

That means that they would have to categorically heat up your organs before they would be determined sufficiently risky to need restrictions on their use.

In most cities you will find Wi-Fi hotspots where you can use your computer. Most people have no idea when they are walking along that they are being exposed to radiation.

Even when I switch on my computer in my house I am told I am in range of discrete wireless connections other than my own so clearly I am not safe indoors either. Infact when I was still associated to the internet via broadband my neighbour came round with his laptop computer and was able to log on using his Wi-Fi from next door!

At the time I notion it was fantastic. Not any more!

In schools too it is becoming increasingly common for wireless networks to be installed, and currently almost 70% of secondary and 50% of traditional schools have them.

Now parents are expressing concern about the potential long term dangers to their children's health. After all their skulls are thinner and still forming so until there's conclusive evidence to the contrary, the "no known adverse condition effects" statement is not very reassuring.

Protests are usually made about siting movable phone masts next to schools but most people do not realise Wi-Fi is equally as dangerous. Apparently in Uk when this programme was produced (2007) there were 3000 Wi-Fi hotspots and 50,000 movable phone masts.

In the programme a radiation monitor was settled next to a laptop computer in a classroom at almost the exact position where a student's head would be. The succeed was the student would have been exposed to between 3 and 4 times more radiation there than if he or she had stood in the main beam of a movable phone mast.

Scary, eh?

People have a option whether or not to use a movable phone but wireless networks in the classroom remove that personal decision. The programme makers did say this level of exposure would not be all the time but especially while downloads. However, since most people use computers for internet passage that could most likely be a primary amount of time.

Despite all this "anecdotal" evidence the government still insist Wi-Fi is safe. Until detrimental condition effects have been established in a laboratory and science can Prove there is a risk that will most likely remain their stance.

I don't believe them. Do you?

Wi-Fi - Why I Don't Think It's As Safe As We Are Led To Believe

Related : Brass Rings Chains Necklaces Pearl Jewelry Cross Body Bags Chokers Necklaces baby nursery bedding